Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION7
PART I: UNDERSTANDING MORALITY AND ESTABLISHING OUR OWN ETHICAL FRAMEWORK8
| Defining Ethics | 8 |
| Are Ethics Absolute? | 8 |
| The Role of Ethical Standards | 9 |
| Written Ethical Rules vs. Customs | 10 |
| Case Study: Pay to Play: Avon's Expansion Into China | 11 |
| Case Study: "No harm, no foul?" | 14 |
| When Ethics and Morals Converge | 16 |
| Moral vs. Ethical Actions | 17 |
| Case Study: Toyota Managing Counsel Dimitrios Biller | 17 |
| Clean Hands Dilemma | 19 |
| Case Study: The Police Officer and the NFL Player | 19 |
| Countering the Clean Hands Dilemma | 20 |
| Case Study: Student Suspended after Carrying Classmate to Nurse | 21 |
| What is Ethical Reasoning? | 22 |
| Case Study: SEC Charges The Kraft Heinz Company | 24 |
| Case Study: Yale Med School Administrator Embezzlement of $40 million | 27 |
| A Framework for Ethical Decision Making | 28 |
| Case Study: A Saint in Sin City | 29 |
| Other Barriers to Ethical Behavior | 30 |
| Bounded Ethicality | 31 |
| Ethical Fading | 32 |
| Convictions, Prison Time: A Look at College Admissions Scam | 32 |
| Cognitive Dissonance | 34 |
| Loss Aversion | 34 |
| Why did no one stop Madoff? | 35 |
| Whistleblowing | 37 |
| Next Steps | 38 |
PART II: STANDARDS TO LIVE BY: CPA CODES OF CONDUCT39
| Texas Rules of Professional Conduct | 39 |
| AICPA Code of Professional Conduct | 40 |
| TX RPC §501.73 Integrity and Objectivity | 42 |
| ET § 1.100.001.01/2.100.001.01 Integrity and Objectivity Rule | 43 |
| TX RPC §501.70 Independence | 44 |
| ET § 0.400.21 (Definitions)- Independence | 44 |
| Case Study: Ernst and Young $100m Fine for Auditors Cheating on Exam | 45 |
| THREATS TO INDEPENDENCE | 47 |
| ET § 1.210.010 Conceptual Framework for Independence | 47 |
| THREATS TO INTEGRITY AND OBJECTIVITY | 50 |
| ET § 1.130.020 Subordination of Judgment | 50 |
| Case Study: Gimme Shelter | 51 |
| ET §§ 1.110.010/2.110.010 Conflicts of Interest | 53 |
| ET § 1.130.010 Knowing Misrepresentations in the Preparation of Financial Statements or Records | |
| ET § 1.140.010 Client Advocacy | 54 |
| DEALING WITH THREATS | 55 |
| ET § 1.000.10/2.000.10 Conceptual Framework for Members | 55 |
| RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE PUBLIC | 56 |
| TX RPC §501.83 Firm Names | 57 |
| ET § 1.820.030 Misleading Firm Names | 58 |
| ET § 1.400.090 False, Misleading, or Deceptive Acts in Promoting or Marketing Professional Services | 58 |
| TX RPC §501.82 Advertising | 59 |
| ET § 1.600.001 Advertising and Other Forms of Solicitation Rule | 59 |
| RESPONSIBILITIES TO CLIENTS/EMPLOYERS | 61 |
| TX RPC §501.74 Competence | 63 |
| ET § 0.300.060 Due Care | 63 |
| ET § 1.300.010 Competence | 63 |
| TX RPC §501.76 Records and Work Papers | 64 |
| ET § 1.230.010 Unpaid Fees | 65 |
| ET §1.400.200 Records Requests | 65 |
| TX RPC §501.75 Confidential Client Communications | 66 |
| ET § 1.400.070/2.400.070 Confidential Information Obtained From Employment or Volunteer Activities | 67 |
| ET § 1.700.001 Confidential Client Information Rule | 68 |
| TX RPC §501.72 Contingency Fees | 68 |
| ET § 1.510.001 Contingent Fees Rule | 69 |
| TX RPC §501.71 Receipt of Commission, Compensation or Other Benefit | 69 |
| ET § 1.520.001 Commissions and Referral Fees Rule | 69 |
| ET § 1.700.020 Disclosing Information From Previous Engagements | 70 |
| ET § 1.700.030 Disclosing Information to Persons or Entities Associated With Clients | 70 |
| RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE BOARD/PROFESSION | 71 |
| ET § 0.300.020 Responsibilities | 71 |
| TX RPC §501.90 Discreditable Acts | 71 |
| ET § 1.400.001 Acts Discreditable Rule | 73 |
| ET § 1.400.010/2.400.010 Discrimination and Harassment in Employment Practices | 73 |
| ET § 1.400.030/2.400.030 Failure to File a Tax Return or Pay a Tax Liability | 73 |
| ET § 1.400.040 Negligence in the Preparation of Financial Statements or Records | 73 |
| Case Study: Steven Martinez | 74 |
| ET § 1.400.050 Governmental Bodies, Commissions, or Other Regulatory Agencies | 74 |
| TX RPC §501.80 Practice of Public Accountancy | 75 |
| ET § 1.400.100 Use of the CPA Credential | 75 |
| ET § 1.800.001 Form of Organization and Name Rule | 75 |
| ET § 2.400.040 Negligence in the Preparation of Financial Statements or Records | 76 |
| Case Study: KPMG'S $456 Million Penalty | 76 |
| ACCOUNTANTS CONFIDENTIAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK | 78 |
PART III: CONQUERING ETHICAL CONUNDRUMS AND INCREASING YOUR ETHICAL PRESENCE81
| Case Study: Stealing Lunch Money at the Rialto Unified School District | 84 |
| Case Study: Rose Valland: An Unexpected Hero | 88 |
Review Questions91
Review Questions: Answers and Explanations94
Key Terms 99
Course Details
Author: Allison M. McLeod, CPA
Publication/Revision Date: 12/24/2025
Course Exam Questions (online): 20 (multiple-choice)
Program Delivery Method: Self-Study (NASBA QAS Self-Study)
Available Formats of Course Text: Downloadable PDF, Printed/Mailed
Course Level, Prerequisites, and Advance Preparation Requirements
| License | Course Level | Prerequisites | Advance Preparation Requirements |
|---|
| CPA | Overview | None | None |
* This program is appropriate for professionals at all organizational levels.
Sponsor ID Numbers
National Registry of CPE Sponsors I.D.: 107615
State CPA Board Sponsor ID Numbers (where applicable)
Florida Division of Certified Public Accounting: 0004761
Hawaii Board of Public Accountancy: 14003
New York State Board for Public Accountancy: 002146
Ohio Accountancy Board: CPE .51 PSR
Pennsylvania State Board of Accountancy: PX178025
Texas State Board of Public Accountancy: 009349
Learning Objectives
As a result of studying the course material, you should be able to meet the objectives listed below:
- To educate licensees in the ethics of professional accounting as CPAs.
- To convey the intent of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and/or specific state board rules in the performance of professional accounting services/work, not to adhere to the mere technical compliance of such rules.
- To aid the CPA in applying ethical judgment in interpreting the rules and determining public interest. Public interest should be placed ahead of self-interest, even if it means a loss of job or client.
- To review and discuss the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and their implications for persons in a variety of practices, including:
- CPAs in client practice of public accountancy who perform attest and nonattest services.
- CPAs employed in industry who provide internal accounting and auditing services.
- CPAs employed in education or in government accounting or auditing.